|
Healing
Parents: The Primary
Mission
Theory
Ali Ansari
: Understanding
Bulimia as a Case in Point
“Yes, I admit that I have a split
personality, and kinda insist that everyone does whether they know and
admit it or not. Don't we all have "two (or more) sides" to
ourselves? Why do we always refer to "a part of me" when we're
undecided about something? But in the case of bulimia, I have to admit
that there is clearly an insistent side and a persistent side.
“The more "I" insist that I
want to be well from it and that it go away, the more "she"
persists in hanging around. The more "I" resist, the more
"she" persists. "She" seems to accept me pretty well
and is patient and ok with my insistence, but "I" do not accept
her at all, quite the contrary. I hate and vilify her with my every breath
and waking thought. I'm totally obsessed and possessed by her, and want
only to be rid of her. So who am I here, really?
“You'd think I'd "get the
message" that she's not going to go away, and learn to live with and
accept her, but what I think I'd have to go through to do that would be
unbearable, I feel so much that I should be ashamed of her.
And what's more, I hate and am ashamed of my mom, too, and would
rather die than be like her, but I am.
“It seems that my only chance is through
understanding, since God knows nothing else (and I've tried literally
everything) has worked. So if I'm going to understand this, I'm going to
have to discover her secret. And if I'm going to discover her secret, I've
got to somehow stop hating her long enough to listen even though I do not
like (obviously) what she has to tell me.
“So - if I'm
going to listen to her, first I've got to accept her. Hmmmm.
“So who is she, anyway? She's certainly
me, but what is she trying to tell me? She's like my secret sister, so
"she's" my secret! I know that much, but if she's got a message
for me, I've got to get to the state of accepting her before I can hear
it.
“But believe
me, that's not easy, ‘cause it's the one thing I've dedicated my life to
not do.
“I'm determined!
I will not accept her and I will not accept my mom in
her present condition, and I will not accept myself in my present
condition - except that myself in my present condition is already a
manifestation of my not accepting myself. So I'm certain of only one
thing, and that is that I'm really confused. And why not? How could I not
be? No one, and I mean absolutely no one, has ever made any sense of, or
in, my life.
“So what is this deep secret love that I
carry? And what is the secret of this deep secret love that I carry?”
******************
UNDERSTANDING SPIRITUAL HEALING
Spiritual healing is the approach
to divinity and divine love well understood by Eastern masters and more
recently by the leading edge psychological researchers and groups of
western healers looking into all resources to understand reasons and cures
for modern diseases. The most recently discovered foundation to this
approach states that the whole of healing is in knowing the difference
between conditional and unconditional love, and that it requires
support from the people of unconditional love to help the people of
conditional love make the transformation. Evidently, the whole of our
self-limiting can be attributed to attempts to meet conditions for love.
Yet love is divine, holy and endless and more and more people are coming
to that realization daily. But if not, then the first step is getting
their attention, getting them to believe and understand it, hence the
point of suffering.
The Sufi poet Hafiz wrote:
"All
your images of winter I see against your sky.
I understand the wounds that have not healed in you.
They exist because God and Love have yet to become
real enough
to allow you to forgive the dream"
It's very clear that until the emotional
entanglement around an anchoring issue is cleared, in most cases, attempts
to clarify or eradicate that issue will fail. So what are 'anchoring'
issues? Anchoring issues are those issues,
traumatic or otherwise, that hold a physical incapacity in place.
Conscious Denial and Why People Refuse to
Heal
Our conscious mind is in many
stages of denial all at once. We deny remembering everything no matter
what and for good reason - even what we ate yesterday. But the entirety of
our experience is stored in our memory.
Healing definitely
means revisiting - being able to make sense of our lives, rather than
exist in a coma of traumatic shock -
and people simply do not want to do that. So rather than heal themselves,
they pass their illnesses and the responsibility for healing them on to
their children who, understandably begrudged, necessarily shoulder that
responsibility. Eventually, after hostility develops, these children want
to cause pain back, they want their parents to show remorse and suffering,
to feel something, so they increase the intensity of their illness or
behavior. This becomes a vendetta in which one would rather die than
forgive and forget.
For many people anger and desire for
revenge can be so strong that they will rebel against the idea of healing
themselves before tasting it. For many people, sickness is their chosen
means of expression for anger, futility, frustration and grief, and of
course they do not want to admit that. So if your sickness is plaguing you
and everything you do to help it go away seems to be failing, you might
want to look into a well-known trick of the self called PR or
Psychological Reversal. You know if you're doing it! It's quite possible
that in spite of all your outward affirmations, you may not really want
to get well. It's possible that your intention has actually
degenerated to pure revenge or some other lesser form of drawing attention
to the real unspoken problem, rather than to getting well. If that is the
case then your illness is the self-accepted punishment you feel you must
suffer for the pleasure you feel in advance for the cruelty you're
enjoying afflicting.
It's OK! We understand this and you are not
wrong! You feel you've been hurt beyond repair and only getting back looks
like any payback at all for the suffering you’ve endured. But how would
it be if we could show you a better way? So you could lighten up on your
objects of revenge, and take some of the pressure and the pain off of
yourself?
Explaining
Illness as a Manifestation of Love
The Secret is this - In the
perfection of God, there is nothing really wrong, it is only a progression
towards understanding that. We need to know what’s right, what is really
happening underneath our illusions and opinions. So in God’s perfect
world, which is present in spite of appearances, everyone is healed
(saved) already, but reaching to that understanding. We help others to
reach this understanding by sending them love and healing from our hearts
first - by seeing them first in the light of God, as already perfect,
healed and progressing toward understanding that. That sending - of light,
love, healing and compassionate understanding - is what heals us! I’m
not saying that this is easy to comprehend, but it is the eventuality, if
your course of healing is progressing in the right direction.
Healing is what
reconnects us with that from which we felt separated.
If we are not - never have been and never will be - separated from God,
(by virtue of the impossibility) then the question is, where and when did
we pick up the feeling or perception of separation? If there is in reality
no separation, what then do we heal? We can only really heal the feeling
of separation. And if we are not healing by
increasingly feeling our divine connection, then something is getting in
the way (often referred to as our ‘self’ or self-definition).
Most of us feel at least somewhat separated
from love or from God. That might even be our primary feeling, and the
motivation to feel love would be our primary motivation. But if it's not
true that we are or ever have been separated from God or from love, then
where did the feeling that we are come from? It came from where we by now
no longer want to go or return.
The feeling of separation is the result of
our initial perception of rejection or misunderstanding by our parents. On
the soul level, that, to us, is completely unacceptable, as we feel bound
to fulfill our primary mission, that of being a source of love and healing
for our parents. So accordingly and in the final analysis, all
of our so-called “innate” hostility can be understood as a
manifestation of our rejection of rejection.
And the BIG Question is, "Are we
willing to let go of that?"
It's not about getting 'back' to God. We're
already there and never weren't. It's about
healing our feelings of separation. And what is our first experience of
that feeling? Our perception of rejection from our parents!
On a soul level, our first material
perception of frustration, anger and hostility arose with our perceived
inability to connect, to complete our primary mission - that of being a
source of love, joy and healing to our parents. We were simply not getting
through.
We can only attribute this feeling of
separation to our perception of rejection. In the infantile framework we
have no other point of reference except to connection or rejection. The
feeling of rejection can only cause us to get sick and eventually hostile.
We will then spend the rest our lives in an attempt to heal ourselves –
our expression of trying to find out and heal "what's wrong" –
and discover that it all boils down to our own self-imposed reactions to
the perception of rejection. Frustration, sickness and hostility all arise
from the perception of rejection. All of our "hostility" is in
reality nothing more than a manifestation of our reaction to this
perception, our rejection of their rejection. How is it then, not a
manifestation of our Love?
As parents learn to heal themselves, their
children will respond accordingly!!!
Think about that! Think
how well it makes you feel to see your parents happy and healed (or does
it?). So heal them in your heart and teach them this! Don't say it can't
be done! It can be done! Here's how, but will you?
********************
HEALING
PARENTS
: The
Primary
Mission
Theory
First - A
Working Hypothesis - What does it mean to have one?
A working hypothesis is a context into
which we can place a series of events and from which we can make sense of
them, which offers the possibility of an optimistic, positive outcome. I
have found that by accepting this theory and presenting it to others as a
working hypothesis, we seem to be able to reach with relative speed and
understanding results hitherto unaccomplished in the field of
enlightenment and spiritual healing.
Case in point
In the final analysis, the illness
of Bulimia (see “The Secret Sister”), reportedly incurable in a vast
majority of sufferers, is not just a cry for help. It’s a social
outrage, speaking out in anger, protest and self-suffering against a
society that has no mercy for parental anxiety and suffering the whole
world over. It is a cry for understanding, support, healing and
forgiveness from these sufferers as children, but not so much for
themselves as for their parents. But what we steadfastly refuse to do is
take the focus off the kids and put it on the parents! And why is that?
Refusing to Accept Rejection
Looked at from the standpoint of
spiritual healing, it will be found that the underlying statement of
self-sick children is one of rejection of rejection. The peaceful
self-aware soul voice of the sufferer is saying, "I'm really OK in
spite of myself and all the things I've taken on to impress you with
something. And don't think I couldn't stop this in a moment if you were
ok, but I won't until you figure out why - that it is you that
needs help, not me." How do we arrive at this very helpful
understanding?
As we all know in one way or another,
children are sent from God to be a blessing, a mercy and a healing for
their parents. However, they are not always accepted as such. I am
proposing that when as babies we are not allowed (for a variety of reasons
later to be investigated) to perform this divine and holy function it
literally makes us sick, which manifest as frustration, confusion and
acquired anxiety. This is currently thought of as the children taking on
the anxieties of the parents, and well understood as such, but I am taking
it a step further and adding to it a yet deeper dimension by hypothesizing
the possibility of an unwavering truth, which I call the Primary Mission
Theory, that “children are sent to bring love and healing to their
parents”. It is their primary mission, and that the illnesses they
take on are a strategy expressing the spiritual frustration coming from
the inability to fulfill that mission, coupled with an inability to
understand why. So they set out on a quest to understand sickness, and the
first they eventually understand, if they succeed, is their own. But it
relates directly to the psychological predicament of their parents.
It is now proven, if not well known, that
Unity heals. Psychological and emotional investigation shows that
releasing emotional blocks increases our capacity to perceive and love
Unity, which increase brings peace of mind and further enables us to heal
and to think well of ourselves. Since Unity is all that exists, can it not
be said that feelings of separation are only feelings, and that it is
these feelings themselves that are interfering with our perception of
Unity? So if there is no real separation, but only the feelings of
separation, where do these feelings come from and how can we prove it and
eradicate them?
Experiments have proven to me that even
having pleasant thoughts about our parents goes a long way toward
increasing our perception of unity and we can actually feel it in the form
of an increased feeling of well being. Reactions to - or varying
degrees of acceptance of - the concept of sending love and healing to our
parents will quickly show the depth and orientation of the problem.
Many spiritual traditions state that children
are the secrets of their parents. This is an assertion with profound
and mostly unwanted implications.
As the parents of self-sick, angry,
violent, neurotic, depressed, destructive, suicidal, bulimic, anorexic
murderous children continue to hide their individual versions of
dysfunction through the conventionally accepted defensive facade of
normalcy, these children, forced to accept it, see that the parents do not
know how to correctly accept personal responsibility. And in looking
outside themselves for some reason for their personal, and in many cases,
unrecognized difficulty, they are willing to cast the blame and
responsibility on "being born" itself. They soon realize that
they have no recourse but to quickly preemptively blame themselves and
soon come to believe that there is actually something wrong with them, no
matter how hard the parents may, in almost all cases, strive to convince
them otherwise. These children
will then, of course, go to great extremes to show and prove
"their" (acquired) dysfunction by acting out and creating
(almost mocking) manifestations of it. The false explanation that there is
something wrong with the children is gladly accepted by all, and their
condition is thereby exacerbated and magnified by being the focus of
attention (which is a ruse).
These children, due to their inability or
unwillingness to understand and accept that something is wrong with their
parents - a difficult realization at best and impossible when you are
young, (although it may dawn somewhat later in life if they are among the
lucky ones who find support for this reasoned approach from among their
peers) - find that they have no choice but to take on the responsibility,
blame and sense of causation for parental dysfunction and therefore must
act out the sickness in themselves that they perceive but cannot
understand in their parents. Mind you, it does not have to be and rarely
is the same form of illness, but for the purposes of this theory, we’ll
just say that sickness is sickness, regardless of the manifestation.
This acting out, as it were, is in its
simplest terms simply the process of understanding. Naïve and innocent,
they literally put themselves on the cross, in the same fire, in order to
take on the responsibility of reaching its conclusion. They take the brunt
of the parental illness or disregard and in doing so demonstrate and
emphasize their parents' lack of real understanding and self-forgiveness.
Setting aside all reactions, defenses and facades, in every case we will
find that there is truth to this hypothesis. Parents must and often do
admit to the stark truth of the matter - that they are completely ignorant
of what’s really going on.
Children are the secrets of their
parents. This has been stated in
religious and spiritual tradition and the reality of it has been proven
and exemplified time and again. Societal
support for the parental denial involved in the inflicting of children
with diagnosable disease adds to the obscuration and mystery of this
problem and many children (now become adults) would prefer to, and do,
die of (their) dis-ease than give up their family secrets. Unfortunately,
the parents of these children are the witting or unwitting accomplices in
this tragedy.
The bottom line is simple and proven if not
easy. As parents learn to heal
themselves, the children will respond accordingly. Just thinking about
it makes one feel better.
The sickness that a bulimic or anorexic
child demonstrates is, in its reducible form, no more than a manifestation
of her perception of the sickness in her family. Her sickness was, and is
still, supported by her family and serves its purpose by taking the
attention off of themselves, by placing it squarely upon the child. And in
her mind and heart - because it is a constructive and purposeful
manifestation of her dedication and determination to fulfill her primary
mission - it cannot go away (be healed) until her primary mission of
bringing love and healing to her parents is accepted. But in order to do
that she must heal herself. And in order to do that she must be able to
take the blame off herself, which is virtually impossible without this
understanding by her parents. Hence, Healing Parents.
Healing Parents - the need for paternal love
- its purpose and why we have it
Look how many people there are in
every profession and especially healing - studying, learning
investigating, traveling, working. And what is the recognizable first and
primary motivation of all children, which carries on into life should it
not be fulfilled in childhood? It is simply to please - and to please our
parents, specifically daddy.
We have, recognize and act upon our need
for paternal love because in our minds the reality of it is simply
not there. We've simply given up and accepted that we'll never really
bring the love and healing to our parents. For many of us the possibility
is no longer even on the horizon. The question in need of healing is - why
is it not there? Why are so many, if not all of us, driven by our need or
desire for paternal love? I might go so far as to propose that
unconsciously we are driven into the fields of healing and psychotherapy
by our need to understand its absence and how to heal it. We are driven by
our desire to heal - but is it just ourselves, and can that ever be
enough? I focus here on men because if the men in families are secure,
loved and healed, the women and children will more likely be also.
Is not security and the perceived lack of
it the major paternal issue? Why
do men feel so all alone? Could it be because they are? Have men abandoned
each other? Is not security in society the reason for guilds (which means
welds or bonds of loyalty and brotherhood)? Is it not the reason for
gangs? How different could it be if gangs were understood in this light
and not made wrong and vilified by a society in need of enemies upon whom
to wage the war at which they are so experienced and from which they make
so much money? What if it were possible to see that the gangs are simply
kids acting out a societal deficiency? Could they not be turned around?
Will they be, or will they continue to manifest their insistence upon help
for their parents
Everyone knows that Aikido is the supreme
and perfected martial art based on knowing that there is no enemy, only
fear, and turning fear, and enemies, into friends. And fear is just the
basic survival instinct. Is it really needed? Or do we, as lonesome,
isolated people, only still think that it is? But if we are still
operating from that adrenaline rush of having just survived, then even if
there is no longer any enemy in sight, we will look to create one out of
need to justify our un-calmed war mode. We are coming out of the lesser
battle for survival and into the greater battle of calming and clearing
the excited, still fighting self. This is the art of peace - of bringing
peace, love and security into ourselves and our world. It's what children,
and innocent, secure and unafraid adults, are all about.
As parents learn to heal themselves, their
children will respond accordingly. Just
think about it.
A Passionate Demand for Help
Until her parents can recognize
their part in the creation of this sickness, they will not cease to be
plagued by it, and the child will not be vindicated and satisfied -
released from the self-imposed responsibility to manifest it. In many
cases the persistence of the bulimic activity can be completely cleared of
emotional confusion and accepted for exactly what it is, a life saving,
self and soul preserving habit acquired as a needed tactic for self
preservation. But the habit is hard to kick until it can be heard and
understood for what it is - a manifestation and reminder of deep seated
resentment, anger and hostility. Then it will simply not be needed any
longer.
Clearing the underbrush - the emotional
confusion around the acquisition of the habit - requires time and a
consistent, properly oriented therapeutic support. But until the habit
itself is deeply understood, it persists in its need to deliver a message.
The message is simple, but not easily heard: "Help my parents, not
me!"
The illness serves also another function,
that of causing the child to investigate herself and the nature and causes
of her condition - where it came from, what it is, how and why she took it
on, what it is demanding (recognizing its symbolization, what it stands
for) - all of which will lead to the inevitably conclusion of hearing a
passionate demand for help for her parents.
This line of reasoning applies not only to
this set of symptoms. As we know, we have a whole generation of societies
of quietly or actively rebellious children bound and determined to scream
on their parents in one way or another, while the parents dutifully seek
support in a medically oriented society willing to accept their money in
exchange for absolution. Only the few and the brave among them seek to
apply radical techniques of personal responsibility and psycho-spiritual
techniques of self investigation to come to proper and satisfying
conclusions.
But as the evidence to this line of
reasoning increases, more and more successful cases will emerge to
convince the society at large that radical reform is both necessary and
immanent, and it does not involve blame, but necessitates the taking of
personal responsibility. As larger support groups develop even more speedy
and radical means towards psychological and emotional clearing, it may
pave the way toward a new understanding of the cause and cure of these
illnesses, which will set free a great number of grateful people to
increase the universal success of this work.
About the Author:
Ali Ansari
is a practitioner of spiritual healing in the tradition of the ancient
masters. His study and research includes Macrobiotics, Homeopathy, Sufism,
Zen and Ayurveda. He is available for phone consultations at 503.548-3769,
Email ali@surrenderworks.com or visit his website @ www.surrenderworks.com |